Just wondering what people's thoughts and views are now that this rule was passed at the league's AGM last week???

35 players is ample imo

_________________
Maz
follow on twiiter @CTmazza04

personally think its a daft rule , and cant understand why a league would want to do this.

As proved last season teams could not get a team out , by limiting numbers signed on does this not make the matter worse.

For example, pelton as i know craig will use them , sign 35 on for the start of the season, 18 man squad say and the rest from other leagues or players not playing sundays to help out if needed. every team does it. End of sept say they have 2 players who they want to transfer in from another team but they cant as 35 are signed on. how does this help?

So i will answer it as i know some will on hear say = just cancel 2 of the players who havent played yet, fair enough, but where does that stop and its more work for the league, so in a months time when 1 of the 2 players cancelled wants to play you just cancel someone else and re sign him? and that will continue all season.

The league committee had nothing to do with this rule, Pelton and Brandon put this idea forward at the AGM and it was passe by vote. All 64 clubs had to vote Yes or No and the majority went with Yes. I think once the Clubs actually think about what it actually means then I'm sure most would have voted No....... We voted NO as we think its a totally pointless league rule, what are the advantages to the CLub, well none!!!

We used more than 35 players last season, if you include lads who transfer in/out then I think we had 45 registered. Last season was a nightmare for us we had about 3 or 4 lads who turned up week in week out. We had loads of injuries and lads who were able to work Sunday mornings which ruled them out of games. Towards the end of the season if this rule was in place then we'd have had to play quite a few games with less than 11 players, probably resulting in us been relegated.

I think this rule was dreamed up to disadvantage Hetton Lyons but it won't!! Hetton Lyons used less players than us, I heard soeone say if Hetton can only sign 35 then that means that they'll be over 40 players available to sign for other clubs...... eh, if this was the case then why didn't these Clubs approach these unused Hetton players and transfer them to their Clubs. I'll tell you why it's because these lads don't want to play on Sunday mornings and more than likely signed as emergency cover!!!

I like the 7 substitutes were you can play 5 of them in a game. This will attractmore players to play Sunday morning football if they can get a run out................. the problem now is that we'll probably not be able to sign them on due to been at our numbers limit

_________________
Ryder - Sedgefield NETPark F.C
http://www.sedgefield-netpark-fc.co.uk

Its 35 players registered in TOTAL. You can't de-register any players and if you transfer a player out this is NOT remove from your player lists total. If you have lads signed who maybe hang up their boots, get injured or become unavailable then its tough!!

_________________
Ryder - Sedgefield NETPark F.C
http://www.sedgefield-netpark-fc.co.uk

Will this impact Kelloe and Hetton in the All England, both sides have signed and played players from different clubs in different leagues for this competition

_________________
Maz
follow on twiiter @CTmazza04

totally agree with netparks comments , most people believe this rule will disadvantage hetton, which it wont , and never gave a 2nd thought as to how it helped them , which it doesnt.

craig , i would think the fa sunday cup wont have a limit on registered players , if it does it will be totally seperate to the league.
ie you could have 35 players signed on in league and 35 different ones signed on for fa sunday cup.

makes the rule even worse if you cant cancel a registration and sign someone else , means you will only sign say 25 , and have to leave 10 spare for transfers etc.

Hes one as well , what if a manager leaves a club , most of players move with him , that club will have to fold as it wont be able to sign anyone else.

I was just reading the rule i know it was proposed as a cap on 35 players but it was never proposed that clubs couldnt de-register or replace transferred lads.

Keith i thought that players had to be registered with the club playing in the AE Cup, i didnt think it was a cup specific registration squad.

_________________
Maz
follow on twiiter @CTmazza04

if you could de-register players then the rule doesnt work really does it , as you could do it as many times as you wish , hence could turn over 40 , 50 , 60 players in a season. alls this would create is more problems , players playing un registered etc

you may be right craig , i just thought it was different , sure someone from hetton could answer it.

The league told us that the issue about de-registering players was an FA rule. I de-registered a player the season before last so I suppose it must have changed since then. I suppose only time will tell how this rule will affect clubs, dont think it will make any difference to us personally, we've never had more than around 25 signed on.

So in that case a lad could be signed on for 2-3 clubs at same time but only play for one? I not put that right hope it makes sense

i think if a player is transfered out , he will be taken off the departing clubs registration list , i think its once you have had 35 players signed on no more will be allowed.

In my opinion i would sign my 18 players i know will be will me 90% of games, this leaves 15 spaces for players, i dont think theres anything wrong with the rule and it will work

_________________
Maz
follow on twiiter @CTmazza04

you obviously dont have a calculator in front of you craig

35 minus 18 = 17

It doesnt effect me either way just debating its worth , like netpark said it could effect them tho.

Are all leagues having the 7 sub rule and 5 can be used or is it again just ddsl?

No a player can only be registered for one club in the same league, you have to transfer as usual. My point is that you could have say have four lads signed who find themselves not getting a game so decide to transfer to another club these four still count in your 35max list the league dont knock four off your totals!!!

Like Maz says this won't affect Pelton as they never use more than say 25 players but alot of clubs do or might find themselves in a position where they need to for whatever reason!!
Maz, what was Peltons reason for this rule been proposed in the first place?


The new 7subs allowed, play a max of five was voted in by all Clubs at the DDSL agm last week.
For it to happen in other leagues then the same needs to happen at their agm's.

_________________
Ryder - Sedgefield NETPark F.C
http://www.sedgefield-netpark-fc.co.uk